Skip to main content
How to waste time trying to solve a problem that even a child can prove you it can't be done...

At least now I want to continue writing on this blog.... I have messed up in the past trying to solve the wrong problem, solve the problem in a wrong way, or trying to solve a problem that can't be solved. So this time I simplify the problem and made sure that there is a answer. But again I failed after 1 week because..... This is what happened......

We were trying to see whether forming a circular link in a sensor network can reduce the overall energy consumption. I did the calculation for a simplified case & figured out it can be done, if two nodes that wants to talk to each other is within a certain angle. Then I tried to solve the big problem by integrating over the whole sensor region. However I got stuck. I then went and talk to my supervisor and discussed about the problem. He said "we don't know whether nodes will follow the shorter or longer path along the circular link, so lets assume it goes through a shorter path 1/2 the time and 1/2 it goes through the longer path". It was more general than the specific angle that I derived and seams to be attractive. Fine, I'll go ahead & solve the problem again by integrating. After wasting a week (well I didn't remember integration much so had to do some background reading) I realized there is no solution & routing through the circular link is worse. Where things go wrong? Well, when my supervisor suggest the change, I never went back and did the calculation for the simplified case. In three lines it can be proven that the new solution won't work (a kid who has a basic idea on geometry will prove this to me).

Lesson Learned:
  1. Do a simple calculation for boundary conditions
  2. If it works go for the general case
  3. If you do any changes in the middle make sure to do the simple calculation again (step 1)
  4. Repeat step 2 and 3 until you are completely done
Well I at least I learn integration so one week is not totally lost....


costume jewelry said…
I like your blog

Popular posts from this blog

1. Building P2P Simulators with OverSim - Where to Begin

This could be a series of blog posts about extending or developing your own OverSim applications & overlay networks. OverSim has a minimal tutorial on writing your own application & overlay network; however, it doesn't show the big picture. So, I'm wasting lots of time playing with code & trying to understand the rest. Good thing is, I like it more & more as I understand. You need to change/develop only a few things, but finding out which ones is a hell of a task. I hope this will not only make my life easy but also will be useful to new comers. Here's what you need to do: You need some background on OMNeT++ OverSim extend OMNeT++. But sometime it has its own way of doing things (to make your task even simple) so understand the differences.Develop several OMNeT++ simulators. TicToc is a good one to start with. Extend it as you imagine.Read Towards a Common API for Structured Peer-to-Peer Overlays, which is the basis for OvseSim's API. Here'…

Python Code to Calculate Gini index/coefficient, Robin Hood index, & Lorenz curve

Following Python code can be used to calculate Gini index, Gini coefficient, Robin Hood index, and points of Lorenz curve. Lorenz curve can be also plot if matplotlib is installed.
It's based on the steps given by Peter Rosenmai.


Other online tools:

Describing Experimental/Simulation Setup

Sometimes the results of a performance analysis may depend on the computers used and/or specific features of software/libraries. In such cases it is extremely important to describe the experimental/simulation set up in details. It enables others to repeat those experiments as well as check whether the results are rigorous, statistically sound, and unbiased. Unfortunately, "Simulation Setup" is the shortest section in many research papers where authors try to save space by cutting down as much as details. Here are some tips on what to include (in addition to describing the experimental/simulation setup) based on my experiences:
Type of Simulation Are the results based on Experimentation, Emulation, or Simulation? If simulations also mention further details like whether it is Discrete Event, Montacarlo, Stochastic, or Deterministic simulation. Are the results for Steady, Dynamic, Starting/ramp-up, or Terminating state(s)?Number of Experiments/Simulations No of sampl…